top of page

Will grass park strips be a thing of the past in Utah due to drought?

Utah Legislature moving ahead on water savings strategies

By Amy Joi O'Donoghue Feb 11, 2022 4:40 p.m. MST

Turf requirements on park strips would no longer exist in Utah under a measure endorsed Friday by a legislative committee, which also approved eliminating cities’ abilities to restrict water wise landscaping.

The bill, HB282 sponsored by Rep. Ryan Wilcox, R-Ogden, was unanimously passed in the House Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment Committee on a 10-0 vote and now will receive consideration in the full House.

“This bill is really simple. What it really says is that we can’t issue a prohibition on xeriscaping in the state of Utah,” Wilcox said. “As a matter of state policy, if someone wants to do the right thing in the second driest state in the nation, we let them. “

  • How can Utahns save water in drought? Governor wants to buy back your lawn

Wilcox pointed to the attractiveness of the landscape conservation garden at Weber Basin Water Conservancy District headquartered in Layton. He said he would be upset if he wasn’t allowed to do something similar on his own property.

Jon Parry, assistant general manager at the district, said the drought has spurred an uptick of cities’ interest in the adoption of water wise ordinances, and more engagement from the public.

The water savings, he added, could be significant.

“We are seeing a huge need in the realm of outdoor irrigation and reducing that demand over all,” he said.

Outdoor irrigation commands upwards of 70% of treated water supplies in the state and leaders are looking for ways to cut back.

  • As the dry, dry water year ends, did you pass the conservation test?

Rachel Simeon and her daughters, Ela and Yara, walk in front of their Salt Lake City home on Aug. 20, 2021. Simeon says she was dumbfounded when she got a letter from Salt Lake City code enforcement, in the midst of Utah’s historic drought, that she needed to add more vegetation to her park strip, which would require more water.Laura Seitz, Deseret News

Wilcox’s bill would restrict cities from requiring turf on more than 35% of one’s property. The measure had appeal from some of his colleagues because it allowed flexibility and didn’t strictly prohibit turf on someone’s property.

Rep. Phil Lyman, R-Blanding, voted for the measure but said there are beneficial purposes of turf — it lowers the ambient temperature — and there are ways to water the lawn more efficiently using a third less water if property owners are committed.

  • Extreme drought, urban heat and the killer targeting Utah’s vulnerable

Later on Friday, House Speaker Brad Wilson, R-Kaysville was joined by Rep. Val Peterson, R- Orem, at a media availability to push the statewide implementation of metering secondary water by 2030.

New connections are already under that mandate, but HB242would require all connections be metered by 2030.

The legislation, which is in the House, facilitates the state tapping into $257 million of federal relief funds to cover 70% of water provider costs.

  • When is the next big snow storm going to hit Utah? Not soon

It includes a “carrot” of allowing more of that money available to providers the sooner they make the transition.

Both Wilson and Peterson stressed that metering of secondary water is the single, most effective step the state can take when it comes to saving water.

Peterson said the timing of the federal relief funding, which allows money to be directed toward water infrastructure needs, coupled with Utah’s relentless drought, was an alignment of the stars to get the state on the right track for increased water savings.

“One of the things we want to do is make a generational difference,” he said, pointing out that over time, the amount of water that will be saved would fill Jordanelle Reservoir.

Peterson admits there has been some pushback to the bill but said if Utah is to achieve a secure water future, metering of secondary water on 205,000 connections needs to happen sooner rather than later.

48 views0 comments


bottom of page